China's imports rose 23.6% in the first ten months of 2026
Customs figures for January-October 2026 show inbound goods growing faster than outbound, and total trade accelerating from the nine-month pace
China's goods trade reached 44.81 trillion yuan in January-October 2026, with imports up 23.6% and exports up 17.6% year on year. Here is what the customs figures mean for an importer benchmarking sourcing volumes and budgets.
AI Summary
China’s General Administration of Customs reported that goods trade reached 44.81 trillion yuan in January-October 2026, up 20 percent year on year. Imports grew 23.6 percent and exports 17.6 percent. The headline pace accelerated from 18.8 percent over the first nine months. For an importer, the figures are a benchmark, not a bill: they tell you how fast inbound demand into China is running so you can compare your own volumes and budget against the national pace.
What happened
The General Administration of Customs released foreign trade figures for January-October 2026 on 10 November 2026, reported by Xinhua and China Daily. The numbers are these:
- Total goods trade: 44.81 trillion yuan for the ten months.
- Total imports and exports: up 20 percent year on year.
- Imports: up 23.6 percent year on year.
- Exports: up 17.6 percent year on year.
- The ten-month total-trade pace of 20 percent compares with 18.8 percent over the first nine months.
The instrument here is the customs release itself. There is no new duty, no new quota and no new licensing rule in these figures. What the release does is set the official measure of how much goods crossed China’s border in the period, split between inbound and outbound.
Year-on-year growth — the change in a value compared with the same period one year earlier, expressed as a percentage of that earlier value. A 23.6 percent import growth figure means the value of goods entering China in January-October 2026 was 23.6 percent higher than in January-October 2025. It is a value measure, so it moves with both volume and price.
The gap between the two directions is the part worth reading twice. Imports grew faster than exports over the ten months. That is the opposite of the pattern many buyers assume when they think about China as an export machine, and it is the figure an importer should hold up against their own book.
| Measure | January-September 2026 | January-October 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Total imports and exports, year-on-year growth | 18.8 percent | 20 percent |
| Imports, year-on-year growth | not stated in the release | 23.6 percent |
| Exports, year-on-year growth | not stated in the release | 17.6 percent |
| Total goods trade value | not stated in the release | 44.81 trillion yuan |
The table shows what the release supports and what it does not. The nine-month comparison exists only for the total-trade growth rate. The import and export splits, and the total value, are given for the ten-month period. Do not read a nine-month import figure into this table; the release does not carry one.
Why now
The timing matters for one reason: the ten-month figure is the last full-period reading before the year-end. It covers January through October, so it captures the bulk of the shipping year and lands before the final two months are booked.
What moved is the pace. Total trade growth ran at 18.8 percent over nine months and 20 percent over ten. The ten-month rate is higher than the nine-month rate, which means October’s own contribution pulled the cumulative figure up rather than down. The release states the acceleration directly; it does not break out October alone.
The import figure is the one that changed the shape of the story. At 23.6 percent, inbound goods grew faster than the 20 percent total and well ahead of the 17.6 percent export rate. For a foreign supplier selling into China, or an importer moving goods both ways, that ordering is the signal.
So what
Treat these figures as a ruler, not an invoice. They carry no duty rate and no per-unit cost. What they give you is the national pace against which your own numbers can be placed, and that placement is where the judgement sits.
The arithmetic is a ratio, and it is the only arithmetic the release supports. Take your own year-on-year change in the value of goods you moved into or out of China over January-October 2026, and divide it by the customs rate for the same direction. If your inbound volume grew faster than 23.6 percent, you gained share against the national pace. If it grew slower, you lost share, even if your absolute volume rose. The same test against 17.6 percent applies to outbound volume, and against 20 percent to your combined book.
Work it through on a hypothetical book, using only the published rates. Suppose an importer’s combined China trade grew at exactly the national 20 percent. That book is tracking the market and nothing more. Suppose the same importer’s inbound leg grew at 23.6 percent while the outbound leg grew at 17.6 percent: the book now mirrors the national split, and the importer has no edge in either direction. The value of the exercise is not the hypothetical. It is that any deviation from these three rates is a fact about your business that the customs release lets you name.
The second use is budgeting. A 20 percent total-trade growth rate is a value measure, so it folds in price as well as volume. An importer building a 2027 budget off a 2026 base should not assume that a 23.6 percent import growth rate means 23.6 percent more physical goods entered China. The release does not separate the two. Budget the value, and treat the volume question as open.
The third use is expectation-setting with suppliers and buyers. When a supplier quotes a price rise and points to “strong Chinese demand,” the customs figure is the check. Imports growing at 23.6 percent is real and it is in the release. Whether that specific commodity is part of the growth is not in the release, and the supplier’s claim needs its own evidence.
A fourth use is timing. The ten-month figure is the last cumulative reading before the year closes. An importer planning shipments for the final two months of 2026 and the opening of 2027 has, in this release, the most recent official statement of the trend. It is a trend, not a forecast. The release does not project November or December, and neither should a budget built on it.
How confident
Confirmed. The General Administration of Customs, as reported by Xinhua and China Daily on 10 November 2026, states that total goods trade reached 44.81 trillion yuan in January-October 2026, that total imports and exports grew 20 percent year on year, that imports grew 23.6 percent, that exports grew 17.6 percent, and that the ten-month total-trade pace accelerated from 18.8 percent over the first nine months. Every figure in this article comes from that release as carried by those two outlets.
Inferred. The release gives growth rates and one total value. It does not give the absolute import value, the absolute export value, a commodity breakdown, or an October-only figure. Any statement about which goods drove the import growth, or about physical volumes as distinct from value, is outside what the document supports. The comparison of your own book against the national rates is a method this article proposes; it is not a finding of the release, and it rests on the single customs document as reported by the two outlets named.
What would change my mind. A fuller customs release carrying the absolute import and export values, a commodity-level breakdown, or a monthly series would let an importer place their own book against a finer measure than three headline rates. A revision of the ten-month figures would change every number here. Absent those, the three rates and the one total are the whole of what the document says.
For you
- Importers benchmarking inbound volume: divide your January-October 2026 inbound value change by 23.6 percent to see whether you gained or lost share against the national import pace, and write the result into your 2027 plan.
- Importers budgeting for 2027: treat the 20 percent total-trade rate as a value measure that folds in price, and do not convert it into a volume assumption the release does not support.
- Exporters and two-way traders: compare your outbound leg against 17.6 percent and your combined book against 20 percent, so the inbound and outbound sides of your business are each measured against the right rate.
- Buyers negotiating with Chinese suppliers: when a supplier cites strong Chinese demand, ask for the commodity-level evidence; the customs release gives the national total, not the line item.
- Anyone planning the year-end: use the ten-month figure as the last cumulative reading before the year closes, and hold it as a trend rather than a forecast for November and December.
If your sourcing decision turns on how China treats returned or re-imported goods, the procedure is set out in Returning Goods to China: The Procedure Behind the Refund. If you move small parcels rather than containers, the cost build-up is in What a Parcel From China to India Actually Costs. And before you commit a deposit to a new supplier on the strength of a demand story, run the checks in How to Tell a Factory From a Trading Company Before You Wire a Deposit.
The data point
China’s goods trade reached 44.81 trillion yuan in January-October 2026, with imports up 23.6 percent and exports up 17.6 percent year on year.
FAQ
What do the January-October 2026 customs figures actually measure?
They measure the value of goods that crossed China’s border in the ten months, split into imports and exports, and compare each with the same period a year earlier. Total goods trade reached 44.81 trillion yuan. Total imports and exports grew 20 percent year on year, imports grew 23.6 percent and exports grew 17.6 percent. Because the figures are values, they move with both the quantity of goods and their prices. The release does not separate the two, so an importer should read the rates as a value benchmark rather than a count of containers or tonnes.
Why does it matter that imports grew faster than exports?
It tells an importer which direction of China’s trade is running hotter. Imports grew 23.6 percent against exports at 17.6 percent, so inbound goods into China outpaced outbound over the ten months. For a foreign supplier selling into China, that is the more relevant rate to benchmark against. For an importer moving goods both ways, it means the two legs of the book should be measured against different rates. The release gives the national totals only; it does not say which commodities drove the inbound growth.
How should an importer use these figures in a budget?
Use them as a ruler, not a forecast. Compare your own year-on-year change in trade value against the matching national rate: 23.6 percent for inbound, 17.6 percent for outbound, 20 percent for the combined book. A result above the rate means you gained share; below it means you lost share, even if your absolute volume rose. Do not convert the value rates into volume assumptions, because the release folds price into the same number. The ten-month figure is the last cumulative reading before the year closes, and it does not project the final two months.
How we calculated this
Inputs (General Administration of Customs, via Xinhua and China Daily, 10 November 2026):
total goods trade, Jan-Oct 2026 = 44.81 trillion yuan
total imports and exports growth = 20 percent year on year
imports growth = 23.6 percent year on year
exports growth = 17.6 percent year on year
total trade growth, Jan-Sep 2026 = 18.8 percent year on year
Acceleration check (the only delta the release supports):
ten-month total-trade rate - nine-month total-trade rate
= 20 percent - 18.8 percent
= 1.2 percentage points
Both endpoints are total-trade rates for the same measure.
No import or export rate is given for the nine-month period,
so no import or export delta is computed.
Benchmark ratio for a reader's own book (method, not a result):
share index = (your Jan-Oct 2026 value change, percent)
/ (national rate for the same direction, percent)
inbound leg -> divide by 23.6
outbound leg -> divide by 17.6
combined book -> divide by 20
index above 1.0 = grew faster than the national pace
index below 1.0 = grew slower than the national pace
Not computed, because the release does not carry the inputs:
absolute import value, absolute export value,
October-only figures, commodity breakdown, volume split.
The point
The customs release gives an importer three rates and one total, and nothing more. Imports at 23.6 percent, exports at 17.6 percent, total trade at 20 percent on 44.81 trillion yuan, with the total-trade pace up from 18.8 percent over nine months. The value is not in the headline. It is in the comparison: put your own January-October book against the matching rate, and you learn whether you are running with the national pace or against it. That is a fact about your business the release lets you name, and it costs nothing to check.
Sources
- Xinhua: China's foreign trade growth picks up pace in first 10 months (english.news.cn/20261110/8ac2eb76620b4da29468642fe18cbfac/c.html)
- China Daily: China's foreign trade up 20% in first ten months of 2026 (chinadaily.com.cn/a/202611/10/WS6af28268e4b03ebf8519b7f4.html)
How this was made
Research and drafting are tool-assisted. Every figure is traced to a named primary source and checked against it, each article clears a structural review and an information-gain review before publication, and corrections are recorded in a dated note above. The review process is described on the about page.